engadget
New York Times
All things Digital
Usa Today
iPhoneHellas
Τελευταία επεξεργασία από: iPhoneHellas, 25/06/2010 - 13:54
Δημοσίευση 23/06/2010 - 08:41
Τελευταία επεξεργασία από: iPhoneHellas, 25/06/2010 - 13:54
Δημοσίευση 23/06/2010 - 09:03
Τελευταία επεξεργασία από: angelo_lagoudakis, 23/06/2010 - 09:04
Δημοσίευση 23/06/2010 - 15:02
Τελευταία επεξεργασία από: sotoskawasaki, 23/06/2010 - 15:03
Δημοσίευση 26/06/2010 - 09:29
-The EVO scores an obvious win on size, but the iPhone certainly has it on pixel density -- approaching that of a printed page -- and even resolution (960 x 640 vs. 800 x 480), and we found it to be a brighter, higher quality display as well.
-The EVO wins the spec war, but in practice we tend to prefer the photos and video produced by the iPhone. It has better sound and less artifacting when shooting video, with a higher framerate at 720p of 30 fps, vs. the EVO's 24. Photos seem better as well, with less JPEG artifacting, less grain, and less chromatic aberration.
- We're confident that most people can survive with the EVO, but if you want battery "comfort," the iPhone is the best bet.
-The EVO benefits from its extra real estate -- the keyboard is almost too large in portrait -- and we like some of the ways HTC handles prediction, like offering multiple word alternatives as you type, but the iPhone still offers the best touchscreen keyboard we've ever used in actual practice,
-For everybody else, the iPhone is the cleaner solution, and in the multitasking-enabled apps we've been using so far, we'd say the iOS approach is usually sufficient
Τελευταία επεξεργασία από: DJTaurus, 26/06/2010 - 09:36
Δημοσίευση 26/06/2010 - 09:31
(1-0)
-Viewing angles are pretty much impossible to split, though we're inclined to give the iPhone the thinnest of edges here as it seemed to give us that bit more definition from tight viewpoints
(1-1)
-When we brought the pair outside for some time in the sunshine,.....Once again, it's a pretty impossible task to differentiate between the output of the Retina Display and Super AMOLED, though if we have to choose, Samsung will get the nod.
(2-1)
-the Retina Display really whoops on the Super AMOLED on the pixel level. Definition still looks ridiculous on the iPhone 4, and Samsung simply can't match it there.
(2-2)
-In fact, checking out our giraffe picture comparison, the Super AMOLED seems to exhibit stronger color saturation and sharper definition, in spite of looking pixelated sat next to Apple's smoother curvatures.
Verdict:Stick both at a normal distance away from the user, and it will likely come down to personal preference again.
Δημοσίευση 26/06/2010 - 13:12
0 μέλη, 1 επισκέπτες, 0 ανώνυμοι χρήστες